Europe is ageing and increasingly populated by ‘grey panthers’, ‘silver surfers’, seniors, ‘baby boomers’ and ‘matures’. In the last two decades in particular grey-specific political mobilisation has witnessed the emergence of such cohort-based parties as ‘Die Grauen’, ‘Suomen Senioripuolue’, ‘Sveriges pensionärers intresseparti’ and the Scottish Senior Citizens Unity Party, which was represented in the Scottish Parliament between 2003 and 2007. With the proportion of the grey electorate expanding, the cost of care for the elderly mounting, the economic case for raising the retirement age overwhelming and sensitivity to ageism growing, this course focuses on ‘grey politics’. It addresses inter alia i) the emergence of ‘grey parties’ ii) the cohesion of the grey electorate iii) the grey policy agenda iv) grey views on topical questions and v) the impact of the ‘grey lobby’ on the mainstream parties. Comparisons will be made throughout between the silver surfers and the ‘young Turks’ – the political behaviour of the students that traditionally have comprised the most active element among the youngest electoral age-group. How wide is the gap in how different generations view politics? Do the traditional voter stereotypes (conservative older voter/left-leaning younger voter) stand up to scrutiny? And how do government respond when ‘greys’ can decide the outcome of elections?
The course will be seminar based with lecture input followed by thematic discussion. Assessment will be by class participation and student assignments.
The 4-week course will be organised around four overarching themes
1. Age and Political Learning
2. Age and Party Politics
3. Age and Political Representation
http://www.uta.fi/jkk/pol/kurssiaineistot/POLVOA41_Arter_lecture_3.pdf
4. Age and Policy-Making
Pre-registration to david.arter@uta.fi by 9th of March.
Attendance at lectures, course diary and 8-page essay in English or Finnish:
GREY PANTHERS, SILVER SURFERS AND YOUNG TURKS: AGE AND POLITICS COURSE ESSAY
“Why are older people more likely to vote and young persons less likely to do so? Explain and discuss this question, relating your answer to a country of your choice.
Approximately 8 pages in English or Finnish
Deadline April 29th
Please note that late essays will not be accepted
Please not that answers that are not directed at the specific question will not be accepted
Please leave the essays in the box outside room Pinni A4046. Electronic submissions will not be accepted
READING
Wouter van der Brug & Sylvia Kritzinger (2012) ‘Generational Differences in Electoral Behaviour’ Electoral Studies 31, 2, 245-249
Danielo Melo & Daniel Stockener (2013) ‘Age and Political Participation in Germany, France and the UK: A Comparative Analysis’ Comparative European Politics (forthcoming; available online)
Hanna Wass (2007) ‘Generation and Socialization into Electoral Participation in Finland’ Scandinavian Political Studies 30, 1, 1-19
Keith Dowding (2005) ‘Is it rational to vote? Five types of answer and a suggestion’ British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7, 3, 442-459
Russell, A.T. et al (1992) ‘Thatcher’s children: Exploring the links between age and political attitudes’ Political Studies 40, 742-756
Chan, T.K & Clayton, M. (2006) ‘Should the Voting Age be Lowered to Sixteen? Normative and Empirical Considerations’ Political Studies 54, 533-558
Wagner, M. Johann, D. & Kritzinger, S. (2012) ‘Voting at 16: Turnout and the Quality of the Vote Choice’ Electoral Studie