Aims: 1) To describe, analyse, compare and contrast the nature of politics and policy-making in the five Nordic states of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden 2) To adopt a thematic approach to understanding politics in the region
Objectives/outcomes: 1) At the end of the course students should be able critically to review the main features of the political systems of the Nordic countries and to place Finnish practice in a wider comparative perspective. The broad focus in this final teaching period will be on legislative-executive relations and i) whether there is a distinctive Nordic parliamentarism, and ii) whether there is a Nordic model of government and iii) whether there has been a 'presidentialisation' of the executive. Topics covered will include 'How democratic are the Nordic parliaments?' The corollary of this question will be determining the evaluative criteria and reflecting on the influence of the premises of participatory democracy and deliberative democracy in the region. Referenda and citizens' initiatives. A discussion of semi-presidential government will take due note of the new constitution in Iceland and changes to the presidential office in Finland. the size, structure and partisan composition of governments; the frequency of minority governments (Denmark, Sweden and earlier Norway); 'surplus majority' governments (Finland); the shift towards 'bloc coalitions and potential alternation in government (Norway and Sweden); the persistence of across-the-blocs, 'anything goes' governments in Finland; The government at work (including informal sessions); the demise of semi-president government in Finland; what sort of president do Finns want? Towards a 'presidential' prime minister in the Scandinavian countries?
COURSE PROGRAMME
The course will be structured around four overarching themes:
Seminar questions will include:
a) What do Nordic MPs do?
b) Can we speak of prime ministerial government in Scandinavia?
c) ‘Minority governments work best where they are most common’ How far is this true in Scandinavia?
d) ‘The institution of the presidency is simply outdated’
e) How useful is the notion of ‘policy style’?
f) Does Scandinavian government deserve its reputation for transparency?
Email registration to david.arter@uta.fi by March 1 essential
COURSE ASSESSMENT
Lecture attendance/seminar participation + course essay
ARE THE SCANDINAVIAN STATES CONSENSUAL DEMOCRACIES?
Huom!! This replaces the earlier essay title
Maximum length: 6 double-spaced A4 pages in English or Finnish
Deadline: May 5th
David Arter, Scandinavian Politics Today Second Edition contains basic information
Supplementary Reading will be posted later